from “hearsay,” to its referent, the “eyesight.” And Ricoeur adds: “The parable should be interpreted metaphorically because it pretends to be plain and trivial” (Semia 1975:98) whereas it may “be converted into a proverb or an eschatological saying” (Ricoeur, 102). Such a convertibility to proverbial expression is for Ricoeur a clear sign of the parabolic character of the discourse. Along that line, my contention is that the name Yhwh plays in Job 38–52 the same role as, e.g., the notion of “Kingdom
Page 45